Acuity Scheduling (now part of Squarespace) is one of the most popular booking tools for independent fitness and wellness professionals. It's clean, affordable, and easy to set up. Many solo personal trainers, massage therapists, and yoga instructors start with Acuity — and it works well at that scale.
But if you're running a studio with recurring memberships, class packs, a growing member base, and the retention challenges that come with it, Acuity's limitations become real operational problems. This comparison explains what each platform is actually built for and when you've outgrown one for the other.
What Acuity Scheduling Is Built For
Acuity is an appointment booking and scheduling tool. Its core strengths are clean client-facing booking pages, calendar sync, intake forms, and automated reminders. If you're a personal trainer seeing 15–20 clients per week on a one-to-one basis, Acuity does that job well. It removes scheduling friction, sends reminders, and keeps your calendar organized.
Acuity also handles packages and gift certificates, which makes it usable for session-based businesses beyond pure scheduling. Pricing is genuinely accessible — their top tier runs under $50/month — which makes it a natural starting point for new practitioners.
Where Acuity Falls Short for Studios
The moment you start running group classes with 10–20 people per session, managing recurring monthly memberships, and trying to understand why members are leaving — Acuity is not designed for those problems.
Memberships and recurring billing: Acuity has basic subscription/package functionality, but it's not built around the recurring membership model that most studios run. Managing multiple membership tiers, handling mid-cycle changes, recovering failed payments — these workflows require workarounds in Acuity that a purpose-built studio platform handles natively.
Member management: Acuity keeps client records, but there's no meaningful member profile — no engagement history, no retention risk signals, no lifetime value tracking. You have a booking log, not a member relationship tool.
Class management: Acuity can run group "appointments," but it's not a class management system. Waitlists, class capacity rules, class packs that work seamlessly across a schedule — these are limited compared to platforms built for class-based businesses.
Revenue visibility: Acuity can tell you how many appointments were booked and basic payment totals. It can't tell you which revenue is at risk, which members are churning, or whether your retention rate is improving. For a studio trying to run a real business, that visibility gap is costly.
What Mako Is Built For
Mako CRM was built for the exact transition point where Acuity stops working: a studio with 50–500 active members, multiple class types, recurring memberships, and the need to actively manage retention and revenue.
Mako handles scheduling and booking — classes, appointments, waitlists, recurring slots. But the platform was designed around the insight that booking is just the beginning of the member relationship. What happens after the first booking determines whether that member stays for a month or three years.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Booking and Scheduling
Acuity's booking flow is excellent for appointments. For class-based businesses, it functions but isn't optimized. Mako's scheduling is built for studio operations: class packs, drop-in rates, membership inclusions, and waitlist logic all work together without configuration gymnastics.
Billing and Payment Recovery
Acuity processes payments but has minimal failed payment recovery. A declined card might get a notification — what happens next is up to you.
Mako's billing layer includes automated dunning sequences, retry logic, and member communication flows that recover failed payments without staff intervention. For a studio with 200 members, automated payment recovery typically brings in $1,000–$3,000/month that would otherwise slip through.
Retention and Member Engagement
Acuity has no retention tooling. It doesn't know that a member who used to book three times a week has dropped to once. It has no concept of churn risk.
Mako surfaces retention signals automatically. When member behavior changes, the platform flags it and triggers a response — an automated message, a staff task, a win-back sequence. This is the core value proposition: keeping members longer through proactive engagement rather than reactive scrambling.
Reporting
Acuity gives you appointment counts and payment summaries. For a solo practitioner, that's enough. For a studio trying to understand MRR trends, class utilization, and retention cohorts — it's not a reporting platform.
Mako's reporting is built around the revenue and retention questions studio owners actually need to answer: Is monthly revenue growing? What's the 90-day retention rate? Which classes are at risk of being cut? Which members haven't been in for two weeks?
Pricing Comparison
Acuity Scheduling tops out around $49/month — genuinely affordable for what it offers. If Acuity is meeting your needs, the price is compelling.
Mako CRM is priced higher, because it's doing significantly more. The ROI calculation is different: if automated payment recovery and retention tooling prevent 5 member cancellations per month at $100/member, the platform pays for itself before you factor in any scheduling value. The CRM ROI math favors purpose-built studio software at the studio scale.
Who Should Use Acuity?
Acuity is the right tool for solo practitioners and very small appointment-based businesses: personal trainers with a private client base, massage therapists, health coaches, and wellness professionals who see clients one-at-a-time. If you don't manage recurring memberships, group classes, or a member retention challenge — Acuity is genuinely excellent at what it does.
Who Should Use Mako?
Mako is built for studios that have moved beyond the solo practitioner model: group classes running several times per week, a membership base of 50+ active members, and the operational needs that come with managing a real fitness business. If member retention, payment recovery, and business visibility matter to your operation — Mako was built for that work.
If you're using Acuity now and finding yourself doing manual work to manage memberships, chase failed payments, or understand why people are leaving — that's the signal that you've outgrown a scheduling tool and need a studio platform.
See how Mako handles the full member lifecycle in the self-serve demo.
.avif)
