Blog Category
May 4, 2026

Mako vs EZFacility: The Right Fit for Independent Fitness Studios in 2026?

A focused comparison of Mako CRM and EZFacility for independent fitness studios. Covers scheduling, membership management, billing, and which platform fits studios vs. multi-sport facilities.

Mako vs EZFacility

EZFacility is facility management software that has served gyms, fitness centers, sports facilities, and recreation centers for years. It's broad in scope — designed to manage not just members but physical resources, courts, lanes, equipment rentals, and multi-sport operations. Mako CRM is purpose-built for the boutique fitness studio: class-based, membership-driven, focused on retention.

If you're evaluating EZFacility alongside Mako, this comparison will help you understand which platform is actually built for your type of operation.

What EZFacility Is Designed For

EZFacility started as facility management software for complex multi-sport operations: sports complexes, recreation centers, gyms with court rentals, facilities with multiple distinct revenue streams. It handles membership management, scheduling, billing, POS, and facility resource booking (court time, lane reservations, equipment rental) in one platform.

For a gym that also runs tennis court rentals, swim lessons, personal training, a pro shop, and group fitness — EZFacility's breadth makes it a reasonable all-in-one tool. The platform can manage the operational complexity of a facility that runs multiple distinct businesses under one roof.

What Mako Is Designed For

Mako is built for studios that are primarily class-based membership businesses: yoga, pilates, CrossFit, HIIT, spin, personal training, and similar boutique fitness formats. The platform's depth is in member relationship management — understanding engagement, preventing churn, recovering failed payments, and building revenue predictability.

Mako doesn't manage court rentals or equipment inventory. It manages member relationships. That narrow focus is intentional: the platform goes deep on the problems that matter most to boutique fitness operators rather than broad across the problems of multi-sport facility management.

Feature Comparison

Scheduling

EZFacility's scheduling handles the complexity of facility operations — resource scheduling, court booking, multi-instructor classes, equipment reservations. If your scheduling challenge involves physical resource allocation, EZFacility's scheduling architecture handles it.

Mako's scheduling is optimized for class-based studio operations: recurring class schedules, capacity management, waitlists, membership-included classes vs. drop-in pricing. It's not designed for resource-based scheduling, but for the standard boutique studio, it covers everything you need.

Membership Management

EZFacility manages memberships as part of facility access control — members can access certain facilities, purchase add-on services, and be tracked by check-in. It's a functional membership system for a broad facility operation.

Mako's membership management is built around member lifetime value and retention. Beyond tracking who has an active membership, Mako tracks engagement patterns, flags declining visit frequency, and surfaces members at risk of churning — before the cancellation happens. For a class-based studio where the member relationship is the entire business, that CRM depth matters.

Billing and Revenue Recovery

EZFacility handles billing, payment processing, and POS for multi-revenue-stream facilities. It works across the breadth of revenue types a facility generates — memberships, classes, court rentals, retail.

Mako's billing is built specifically for recurring membership revenue with automated dunning and recovery. Failed payment sequences and smart retry logic operate automatically, recovering revenue that would otherwise be lost to involuntary churn.

Retention and Engagement

EZFacility has basic member communication tools — automated messages, reminders, notifications. As a facility management platform, its retention tooling is limited; the focus is operational management, not relationship management.

Mako's retention layer is where the platform was built from: engagement scoring, behavioral alerts, automated re-engagement sequences, and churn prediction based on visit patterns. These tools work in the background — identifying at-risk members, triggering outreach, and giving studio owners visibility into who needs attention before they cancel.

Reporting

EZFacility's reporting covers the operational metrics of a multi-service facility: revenue by service line, court utilization, membership counts, staff hours. Comprehensive for a facility operator managing multiple revenue streams.

Mako's reporting is built for the studio owner asking revenue and retention questions: monthly recurring revenue trends, retention rate by cohort, class utilization, lifetime value by membership type. The reports are fewer but more directly actionable for a single-business studio operator.

Pricing

EZFacility pricing varies by facility size and feature package, starting around $99/month and scaling upward. For a boutique fitness studio using only a fraction of EZFacility's capabilities, you're paying for facility management breadth you don't use.

Mako is priced for independent studios as a flat rate, covering the features that boutique studios actually need without the overhead of facility management infrastructure.

Who Should Choose EZFacility?

EZFacility is the right fit for multi-sport facilities, recreation centers, and gyms that manage multiple distinct revenue streams and physical resource scheduling — court rentals, lane reservations, equipment, retail, and fitness classes under one roof. If your operation is complex across those dimensions, EZFacility's breadth serves you.

Who Should Choose Mako?

Mako is right for independent boutique fitness studios where the primary business is class-based memberships — yoga, pilates, CrossFit, HIIT, personal training, and similar formats. If you don't need facility resource management and your primary challenges are member retention, payment recovery, and business visibility — Mako is built specifically for your operational profile.

The distinction between a facility management tool and a studio CRM matters: one manages resources and transactions, the other manages relationships and revenue.

Explore Mako's studio-specific features in the self-serve demo — no sales call required.

Articles you may like

Yoga Studio Class Format Mix
Yoga Studio Class Format Mix: How to Design a Schedule That Retains Members Across Levels

A guide to class format mix design for yoga studios — covers how different yoga formats serve different member segments and what that means for retention, the scheduling economics of running multiple formats on limited floor time, how to read format-level attendance data to identify which formats are underperforming, when a new format is genuinely demand-driven vs. when it's novelty-driven, and the design mistakes studios make when adding formats that cannibalize existing class attendance without growing total member engagement.

6 min read
May 20, 2026
Yoga Studio Instructor Pay Structures
Yoga Studio Instructor Pay Structures: Per-Class, Per-Head, and When Each Makes Sense

A guide to instructor compensation design for yoga studios — covers the three main pay structure models (flat per-class, per-head variable, and hybrid), how each model shapes instructor behavior around class building, schedule commitment, and student retention, the specific incentive misalignments that emerge from per-head pay at low class sizes, how to set rates that are competitive without destroying margin, and what transparency around pay structure does to studio culture.

7 min read
May 20, 2026