Blog Category
May 6, 2026

Mako vs Glofox: Which Fitness Platform Is Right for Your Studio in 2026?

Glofox is the platform for boutique fitness chains building a gamified member-app experience. Mako is the platform for independent operators who need financial intelligence and predictable pricing. The overlap is real — the fit question decides it.

Mako vs Glofox

Glofox — now ABC Glofox after the ABC Fitness acquisition — has strong traction with boutique fitness studios that care about the member app experience. The gamification layer, community features, and polished mobile UX are genuine strengths. The pricing opacity and post-acquisition support complaints are genuine weaknesses. Mako doesn't gamify. It gives you financial intelligence, automated retention, and predictable flat-rate pricing instead. Whether that trade-off works depends on your priorities.

Pricing

Glofox: Does not publish pricing. Custom quotes only — typical range reported by users is $150–$400+/month for a single location, scaling with features and location count. Onboarding fees apply. The sales-led process means you won't know your real cost until you've spent 3 hours on calls.

Mako: $99–$299/month flat-rate, published on the website, month-to-month, no onboarding fees, self-serve demo.

The inability to self-evaluate Glofox pricing is itself a signal. Platforms that publish prices do so because they're confident in the value. Platforms that hide pricing often charge different customers different amounts.

The ABC Acquisition Factor

Glofox was acquired by ABC Fitness in 2022. Since then, user reviews have been mixed — strong praise for the product itself, more complaints about support responsiveness, contract terms, and the complexity introduced by operating within a larger enterprise. This isn't unique to Glofox: almost every platform acquired by a private equity-backed fitness conglomerate goes through the same arc. If you're evaluating Glofox, check recent G2 and Capterra reviews specifically for post-2023 experiences, not historical praise.

Feature Comparison

Member App and Gamification

Glofox: Best-in-category member app experience. Polished, fast, with gamification features (leaderboards, streaks, challenges) that drive engagement and create social proof within the member community. If the member app is part of how you sell the studio experience, Glofox delivers.
Mako: Mobile experience for members included. Clean and functional. No gamification layer.

Edge: Glofox on member-facing app experience.

Class Scheduling

Glofox: Strong class scheduling with a mobile-first booking flow. Built around the boutique fitness studio model — cycling, HIIT, yoga, boxing. Handles high-frequency booking windows well.
Mako: Full class and appointment scheduling, recurring sessions, waitlists, staff management. Strong on admin operations.

Edge: Tied for standard studio operations.

Financial Intelligence

Glofox: Revenue reporting and membership analytics. Post-acquisition integration with ABC's financial services adds some billing infrastructure, but native MRR, LTV, and churn dashboards are not a Glofox strength.
Mako: Native MRR, LTV, churn, CAC, cash runway. The financial dashboard is the product differentiator.

Edge: Mako, significantly.

Failed Payment Recovery

Glofox: Billing infrastructure via ABC's financial backend. Failed payment handling functional but not automated recovery-focused.
Mako: Full automated failed-payment recovery — retry sequences, dunning, SMS card-update requests.

Edge: Mako.

Lead Generation and Sales Tools

Glofox: Lead capture forms, trial management, and conversion tracking built in. Specifically designed for studios that run a structured sales process to convert prospects to members.
Mako: Lead capture and CRM pipeline present. Less sales-process-focused than Glofox.

Edge: Glofox for studios with a dedicated sales workflow.

Pricing Transparency and Contract Terms

Glofox: Opaque pricing, custom contracts, annual commitments standard. Users report difficulty exiting contracts early.
Mako: Published pricing, month-to-month, no early termination.

Edge: Mako, clearly.

The Decision

Pick Glofox if:

  • The member app is central to your brand and you need gamification, leaderboards, and challenges as product features
  • You run 2+ locations and need multi-location management with a polished member experience across all of them
  • You have a structured sales process and need lead-to-member pipeline management
  • You've checked recent support reviews and are comfortable with the post-acquisition support track record

Pick Mako if:

  • You're a single-location independent studio or gym that doesn't need gamification to drive retention
  • You need MRR, LTV, and financial health visible without a secondary system
  • You want self-serve evaluation — no sales calls, no custom quotes, no 3-week discovery process
  • You want month-to-month pricing with no contract lock-in risk

Your wellness business is a business. Not a hobby, not a side project, not a calendar with a cash register. It deserves software that treats it accordingly. If your CRM can't tell you whether your business is financially healthy, it's not doing its job. And in 2026, you have better options.

See Mako in action — no sales call required

Mako is built for independent studio and service-business owners who'd rather spend their time on clients than on demo calls. Open the live demo, poke around, and see exactly how scheduling, billing, and financial intelligence come together in one place.

Try the demo: https://app.makocrm.so/demo

Self-serve. Instant access. No forms, no calendars, no "talk to sales."

Articles you may like

Yoga Studio Class Format Mix
Yoga Studio Class Format Mix: How to Design a Schedule That Retains Members Across Levels

A guide to class format mix design for yoga studios — covers how different yoga formats serve different member segments and what that means for retention, the scheduling economics of running multiple formats on limited floor time, how to read format-level attendance data to identify which formats are underperforming, when a new format is genuinely demand-driven vs. when it's novelty-driven, and the design mistakes studios make when adding formats that cannibalize existing class attendance without growing total member engagement.

6 min read
May 20, 2026
Yoga Studio Instructor Pay Structures
Yoga Studio Instructor Pay Structures: Per-Class, Per-Head, and When Each Makes Sense

A guide to instructor compensation design for yoga studios — covers the three main pay structure models (flat per-class, per-head variable, and hybrid), how each model shapes instructor behavior around class building, schedule commitment, and student retention, the specific incentive misalignments that emerge from per-head pay at low class sizes, how to set rates that are competitive without destroying margin, and what transparency around pay structure does to studio culture.

7 min read
May 20, 2026